Bitte aktualisieren Sie Ihren Browser zur korrekten Anzeige dieser Webseite.

Group consensus

Workshop mit Boy Vereecken
One can establish the meaning of the word “heap” by appealing to group consensus. This approach claims that a collection of grains is as much a “heap” as the proportion of people in a group who believe it to be so. In other words, the probability that any collection is considered a heap is the expected value of the distribution of the group’s views.
A group may decide that: • One grain of sand on its own is not a heap. • A large collection of grains of sand is a heap.
Between the two extremes, individual members of the group may disagree with each other over whether any particular collection can be labelled a “heap”. The collection can then not be definitively claimed to be a “heap” or “not a heap”. This can be considered an appeal to descriptive linguistics rather than prescriptive linguistics, as it resolves the issue of definition based on how the population uses natural language. Indeed, if a precise prescriptive definition of “heap” is available then the group consensus will always be unanimous and the paradox does not arise.


Workshop 2016
Group consensus
Group consensus
Group consensus
Group consensus
Group consensus
Group consensus
Group consensus
Group consensus
Group consensus
Group consensus
Group consensus